Europa League European Access : Visitor Change plan
Europa League analysis

Matchday 3 - Season 2026-27

Quantified analysis and probabilities generated by the Footlab engine.

Data-driven model 18 Match(es) Updated matchday after matchday.

Matchday summary

Period: J3 Matches played and predicted: 7 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated decisions 7
Total simulated amount 105,00 €
Simulated result -34,50 €
Overall ROI -32,9 %

Calculated from simulated decisions and associated odds.

Editorial combo — outside Footlab engine

Editorial selection offered for educational purposes only. No betting advice.
The amounts shown illustrate a one-off example with a simulated stake.

Simulated stake 10,00 €
Combined odds (information) 8,29
Indicative result -10,00 €

Results recap

  • Dinamo Zagreb vs NEC Nijmegen — Pick 1 — Result 2 (2 - 4)
  • Plzen vs Levski Sofia — Pick 1 — Result 2 (1 - 2)
  • Celtic vs Celta Vigo — Pick 1 — Result 2 (1 - 2)
Finished Score: 1 - 1 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score 7,454

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
2,51
xG
2,78
16
Shots
25
6
Shots on target
11
Possession
43,0 %
Possession
57,0 %
Discipline
7
Fouls
13
0
Yellow cards
1
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 4.89 / 4.20 / 1.63
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 60,7 % N 24,0 % 2 15,3 %
Values 1 / N / 2 1,880 / -0,040 / -0,750
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 2 - 2 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score -1,728

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
2,25
xG
1,72
14
Shots
16
4
Shots on target
5
Possession
54,0 %
Possession
46,0 %
Discipline
14
Fouls
10
1
Yellow cards
1
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 1.59 / 4.20 / 5.34
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 37,6 % N 28,3 % 2 34,2 %
Values 1 / N / 2 -0,410 / 0,130 / 1,050
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 2 - 4 View match
1
Engine decision
Footlab decision 1
Associated probability 73,3 %
Cote correspondante 1.68
Weighted score 13,567

Dinamo Zagreb favorisé par Defense (CS) (+10,00).

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
2,62
xG
1,25
16
Shots
15
10
Shots on target
5
Possession
58,0 %
Possession
42,0 %
Discipline
11
Fouls
18
1
Yellow cards
2
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation
Simulated amount 20,00 €
Simulated result -20,00 €
Match ROI -100,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 1.68 / 4.17 / 4.51
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 73,3 % N 18,9 % 2 7,8 %
Values 1 / N / 2 0,210 / -0,230 / -0,630
Raw pick 1
Finished Score: 1 - 0 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score 4,294

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
1,47
xG
0,73
13
Shots
14
5
Shots on target
1
Possession
29,0 %
Possession
71,0 %
Discipline
23
Fouls
9
3
Yellow cards
3
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 3.50 / 3.66 / 2.03
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 53,1 % N 26,2 % 2 20,8 %
Values 1 / N / 2 0,860 / -0,060 / -0,570
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 4 - 1 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score 4,998

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
2,11
xG
0,79
14
Shots
8
5
Shots on target
4
Possession
58,0 %
Possession
42,0 %
Discipline
18
Fouls
11
4
Yellow cards
2
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 1.37 / 5.04 / 7.72
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 54,8 % N 25,8 % 2 19,4 %
Values 1 / N / 2 -0,250 / 0,290 / 0,560
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 0 - 2 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score -11,066

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
0,27
xG
3,13
6
Shots
33
2
Shots on target
15
Possession
37,0 %
Possession
63,0 %
Discipline
5
Fouls
21
1
Yellow cards
3
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 9.79 / 6.38 / 1.25
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 17,2 % N 24,9 % 2 57,9 %
Values 1 / N / 2 1,070 / 0,740 / -0,310
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 4 - 0 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score 0,278

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
2,76
xG
0,65
29
Shots
6
15
Shots on target
4
Possession
69,0 %
Possession
31,0 %
Discipline
6
Fouls
13
2
Yellow cards
3
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 1.36 / 5.30 / 7.40
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 42,7 % N 27,9 % 2 29,4 %
Values 1 / N / 2 -0,440 / 0,610 / 1,640
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 0 - 4 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score -4,544

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
0,43
xG
1,70
9
Shots
17
4
Shots on target
9
Possession
39,0 %
Possession
61,0 %
Discipline
9
Fouls
15
2
Yellow cards
0
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 5.68 / 4.45 / 1.53
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 30,6 % N 28,1 % 2 41,3 %
Values 1 / N / 2 0,760 / 0,220 / -0,370
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 3 - 0 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score -10,023

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
3,18
xG
0,17
20
Shots
3
7
Shots on target
0
Possession
64,0 %
Possession
36,0 %
Discipline
18
Fouls
15
2
Yellow cards
3
0
Red cards
1
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 2.21 / 3.63 / 3.10
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 19,0 % N 25,6 % 2 55,4 %
Values 1 / N / 2 -0,590 / -0,080 / 0,770
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 3 - 0 View match
N
Engine decision
Footlab decision N
Associated probability 28,1 %
Cote correspondante 4.01
Weighted score -0,526

Match équilibré : 1899 Hoffenheim porté par Classement (+5,50), Lyon par Elo Europeen (-8,72).

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
2,12
xG
0,62
21
Shots
8
8
Shots on target
2
Possession
43,0 %
Possession
57,0 %
Discipline
20
Fouls
6
3
Yellow cards
0
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation
Simulated amount 15,00 €
Simulated result -15,00 €
Match ROI -100,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 1.95 / 4.01 / 3.45
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 40,6 % N 28,1 % 2 31,3 %
Values 1 / N / 2 -0,190 / 0,120 / 0,020
Raw pick N
Finished Score: 1 - 2 View match
1
Engine decision
Footlab decision 1
Associated probability 55,7 %
Cote correspondante 2.92
Weighted score 5,357

Celtic favorisé par Elo Europeen (+7,10).

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
0,59
xG
1,27
8
Shots
22
4
Shots on target
4
Possession
44,0 %
Possession
56,0 %
Discipline
10
Fouls
5
4
Yellow cards
0
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation
Simulated amount 20,00 €
Simulated result -20,00 €
Match ROI -100,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 2.92 / 3.56 / 2.34
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 55,7 % N 25,5 % 2 18,8 %
Values 1 / N / 2 0,460 / -0,110 / -0,510
Raw pick 1
Finished Score: 0 - 6 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score -2,931

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
1,90
xG
2,25
14
Shots
16
2
Shots on target
8
Possession
44,0 %
Possession
56,0 %
Discipline
8
Fouls
6
1
Yellow cards
2
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 5.37 / 4.62 / 1.53
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 34,5 % N 28,3 % 2 37,2 %
Values 1 / N / 2 1,070 / 0,270 / -0,440
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 0 - 3 View match
2
Engine decision
Footlab decision 2
Associated probability 46,0 %
Cote correspondante 2.28
Weighted score -6,355

Anderlecht favorisé par Classement (-2,75).

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
0,29
xG
1,06
6
Shots
15
1
Shots on target
8
Possession
41,0 %
Possession
59,0 %
Discipline
12
Fouls
20
3
Yellow cards
3
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation
Simulated amount 5,00 €
Simulated result +6,40 €
Match ROI +128,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 3.02 / 3.57 / 2.28
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 26,5 % N 27,5 % 2 46,0 %
Values 1 / N / 2 -0,180 / -0,040 / 0,040
Raw pick 2
Finished Score: 2 - 2 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score -7,588

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
0,71
xG
0,42
5
Shots
8
2
Shots on target
3
Possession
59,0 %
Possession
41,0 %
Discipline
11
Fouls
16
2
Yellow cards
1
1
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 2.14 / 3.83 / 3.10
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 23,8 % N 27,0 % 2 49,2 %
Values 1 / N / 2 -0,500 / 0,000 / 0,600
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 1 - 0 View match
NO BET
Engine decision
Footlab decision No decision
Associated probability —
Cote correspondante —
Weighted score 7,374

Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
2,26
xG
0,82
23
Shots
14
3
Shots on target
1
Possession
60,0 %
Possession
40,0 %
Discipline
7
Fouls
13
2
Yellow cards
4
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation

Simulation unavailable.

Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 1.55 / 4.26 / 5.70
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 60,5 % N 24,1 % 2 15,4 %
Values 1 / N / 2 -0,090 / 0,010 / -0,040
Raw pick Pas de pari
Finished Score: 1 - 2 View match
1
Engine decision
Footlab decision 1
Associated probability 62,0 %
Cote correspondante 1.69
Weighted score 8,022

Plzen favorisé par Elo Europeen (+7,25).

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
0,97
xG
1,17
13
Shots
6
2
Shots on target
3
Possession
63,0 %
Possession
37,0 %
Discipline
9
Fouls
11
1
Yellow cards
1
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation
Simulated amount 10,00 €
Simulated result -10,00 €
Match ROI -100,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 1.69 / 4.01 / 4.69
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 62,0 % N 23,6 % 2 14,4 %
Values 1 / N / 2 0,090 / -0,100 / -0,350
Raw pick 1
Finished Score: 1 - 4 View match
N
Engine decision
Footlab decision N
Associated probability 28,1 %
Cote correspondante 5.03
Weighted score -0,321

Match équilibré : Omonia Nicosia porté par Defense (CS) (+5,00), Benfica par Elo Europeen (-7,93).

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
0,91
xG
3,25
7
Shots
23
5
Shots on target
10
Possession
36,0 %
Possession
64,0 %
Discipline
12
Fouls
11
1
Yellow cards
4
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation
Simulated amount 20,00 €
Simulated result -20,00 €
Match ROI -100,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 7.42 / 5.03 / 1.38
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 41,2 % N 28,1 % 2 30,8 %
Values 1 / N / 2 2,290 / 0,400 / -0,580
Raw pick N
Finished Score: 2 - 2 View match
N
Engine decision
Footlab decision N
Associated probability 27,8 %
Cote correspondante 3.94
Weighted score 0,740

Match équilibré : Celje porté par Avantage Forme Specifique (+3,23), Red Bull Salzburg par Defense (CS) (-5,00).

Compared statistics
Home vs Away
Attacking
1,68
xG
1,62
9
Shots
15
3
Shots on target
4
Possession
47,0 %
Possession
53,0 %
Discipline
14
Fouls
10
2
Yellow cards
2
0
Red cards
0
Period: J3 Matches: 1 Simulated

Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.

Small sample: interpret with caution.

Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts Fictional simulation
Simulated amount 15,00 €
Simulated result +44,10 €
Match ROI +294,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2 4.19 / 3.94 / 1.78
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 43,9 % N 27,8 % 2 28,3 %
Values 1 / N / 2 1,420 / 0,110 / -0,540
Raw pick N

Amounts displayed are fictional simulations.

Standings & statistics Compare two teams
Prévention jeu excessif Jouer comporte des risques : endettement, isolement, dépendance. Appelez le 09 74 75 13 13 (appel non surtaxé).