Premier League analysis
Matchday 5 - Season 2026-27
Quantified analysis and probabilities generated by the Footlab engine.
Data-driven model
10 Match(es)
Updated matchday after matchday.
Fixtures
Matchday summary
Period: J5
Matches played and predicted: 3
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated decisions
3
Total simulated amount
25,00 €
Simulated result
+6,50 €
Overall ROI
+26,0 %
Calculated from simulated decisions and associated odds.
Editorial combo — outside Footlab engine
Editorial selection offered for educational purposes only. No betting advice. The amounts shown illustrate a one-off example with a simulated stake.
Simulated stake
10,00 €
Combined odds (information)
15,44
Indicative result
-10,00 €
Results recap
Leeds vs Crystal Palace — Pick 1 — Result N (0 - 0)
Bournemouth vs Liverpool — Pick 2 — Result 2 (0 - 1)
Brentford vs Chelsea — Pick N — Result 1 (3 - 0)
Brentford
vs
Chelsea
Finished
On 18 Sep 2026 at 21:00
Tottenham
vs
Aston Villa
Finished
On 19 Sep 2026 at 13:30
Newcastle
vs
Hull City
Finished
On 19 Sep 2026 at 16:00
Everton
vs
Ipswich
Finished
On 19 Sep 2026 at 16:00
Brighton
vs
Arsenal
Finished
On 19 Sep 2026 at 16:00
Nottingham Forest
vs
Coventry
Finished
On 19 Sep 2026 at 18:30
Manchester City
vs
Sunderland
Finished
On 20 Sep 2026 at 15:00
Leeds
vs
Crystal Palace
Finished
On 20 Sep 2026 at 15:00
Bournemouth
vs
Liverpool
Finished
On 20 Sep 2026 at 15:00
Fulham
vs
Manchester United
Finished
On 20 Sep 2026 at 17:30
Footlab decision
N
Associated probability
28,1 %
Cote correspondante
3.50
Weighted score
-0,209
Match équilibré : Brentford porté par Buts (+2,28), Chelsea par Potentiel (-2,81).
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulated amount
5,00 €
Simulated result
-5,00 €
Match ROI
-100,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
2.60 /
3.50 /
2.50
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 41,5 %
N 28,1 %
2 30,5 %
Values 1 / N / 2
0,190
/
0,040
/
-0,300
Raw pick
N
Footlab decision
No decision
Associated probability
—
Cote correspondante
—
Weighted score
2,652
Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulation unavailable.
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
2.20 /
3.30 /
3.20
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 48,9 %
N 27,1 %
2 24,1 %
Values 1 / N / 2
-0,050
/
-0,030
/
-0,090
Raw pick
Pas de pari
Footlab decision
No decision
Associated probability
—
Cote correspondante
—
Weighted score
-2,748
Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulation unavailable.
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
1.36 /
4.75 /
6.50
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 35,0 %
N 28,3 %
2 36,7 %
Values 1 / N / 2
-0,440
/
0,220
/
0,840
Raw pick
Pas de pari
Footlab decision
No decision
Associated probability
—
Cote correspondante
—
Weighted score
6,134
Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulation unavailable.
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
1.65 /
3.70 /
4.75
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 57,6 %
N 25,0 %
2 17,4 %
Values 1 / N / 2
0,000
/
-0,050
/
-0,220
Raw pick
Pas de pari
Footlab decision
No decision
Associated probability
—
Cote correspondante
—
Weighted score
-7,146
Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulation unavailable.
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
4.33 /
3.60 /
1.75
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 24,7 %
N 27,2 %
2 48,1 %
Values 1 / N / 2
0,180
/
0,090
/
-0,180
Raw pick
Pas de pari
Footlab decision
No decision
Associated probability
—
Cote correspondante
—
Weighted score
5,899
Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulation unavailable.
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
1.75 /
3.70 /
4.50
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 57,0 %
N 25,2 %
2 17,8 %
Values 1 / N / 2
-0,080
/
0,010
/
-0,060
Raw pick
Pas de pari
Footlab decision
No decision
Associated probability
—
Cote correspondante
—
Weighted score
14,127
Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulation unavailable.
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
1.25 /
5.25 /
10.00
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 74,3 %
N 18,4 %
2 7,3 %
Values 1 / N / 2
-0,050
/
0,060
/
-0,270
Raw pick
Pas de pari
Footlab decision
1
Associated probability
57,8 %
Cote correspondante
2.10
Weighted score
6,215
Leeds favorisé par Buts (+3,04).
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulated amount
5,00 €
Simulated result
-5,00 €
Match ROI
-100,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
2.10 /
3.40 /
3.25
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 57,8 %
N 24,9 %
2 17,3 %
Values 1 / N / 2
0,040
/
-0,050
/
-0,250
Raw pick
1
Footlab decision
2
Associated probability
55,5 %
Cote correspondante
2.10
Weighted score
-10,063
Liverpool favorisé par Defense (CS) (-2,49).
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulated amount
15,00 €
Simulated result
+16,50 €
Match ROI
+110,0 %
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
3.00 /
3.60 /
2.10
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 19,0 %
N 25,6 %
2 55,5 %
Values 1 / N / 2
-0,410
/
-0,030
/
0,190
Raw pick
2
Footlab decision
No decision
Associated probability
—
Cote correspondante
—
Weighted score
-3,383
Pas de pari : le moteur ne distingue pas assez nettement le résultat.
Compared statistics
Period: J5
Matches: 1
Simulated
Descriptive indicator — does not predict future results.
Small sample: interpret with caution.
Understanding these numbers
Simulated amounts
Fictional simulation
Simulation unavailable.
Advanced data
Cote 1 / N / 2
3.60 /
3.70 /
1.91
1 / N / 2 probabilities
1 33,4 %
N 28,2 %
2 38,3 %
Values 1 / N / 2
0,200
/
0,070
/
-0,250
Raw pick
Pas de pari
Amounts displayed are fictional simulations.
For information purposes only. Displayed probabilities and odds describe a statistical reading of the match. Footlab provides no betting advice and no promise of results.
Prévention jeu excessif
Jouer comporte des risques : endettement, isolement, dépendance. Appelez le 09 74 75 13 13 (appel non surtaxé).